Question Period - Monday, November 17, 2025
Monday, November 17, 2025
Question Period session with 6 exchanges between Hon. Pierre Poilievre (Leader of the Opposition, CPC) and Right Hon. Mark Carney (Prime Minister, Lib.). Average Question Rigor: 83. Average PM Spin: 59.
SESSION OVERVIEW

Pierre Poilievre
Leader of Opposition
(86%)
Question Rigor
SPINHIGH
SPIN

Mark Carney
Prime Minister
(58%)
Answer Directness
Pierre Poilievre
Leader of the Opposition
“Mr. Speaker, Canadians deserve an affordable life with an affordable budget, but this Prime Minister is using his budget and the deficit like a credit card with no limit. In doing so, he is driving up the price of groceries, housing and future taxes. According to the Parliamentary Budget Officer, the Prime Minister has doubled Justin Trudeau's deficit. That is a record deficit outside of COVID‑19. That is $16 billion more than he promised. Why is the Prime Minister using his budget like a limitless credit card while forcing Canadians to make costly sacrifices?”
Clarity & specificity
85%
B — The question is clear and specific, citing evidence from the Parliamentary Budget Officer and directly asking about the Prime Minister's budget practices.
Question Factors
- •Clear evidence cited
- •Direct question at the end
- •Focus on specific issue of budget management
Mark Carney
Prime Minister
“Mr. Speaker, budget 2025 is a budget of generational investments. It is a budget that is going to grow our economy. According to the Parliamentary Budget Officer, the current fiscal policy is considered sustainable over the long term.”
How directly answered
65%
Sharp question met with vague assurances.
D — The answer does not directly address the question about budget practices and instead shifts to generalities about the budget's benefits.
Answer Factors
- •Avoids the core question
- •Generic response about economic growth
- •No engagement with cited evidence
Pierre Poilievre
Leader of the Opposition
“Mr. Speaker, this is multi-generational debt. Canadians deserve affordable groceries. In fact, the Prime Minister promised that he would be judged by the price of groceries. Today, Statistics Canada released data showing that food inflation is almost double the Bank of Canada's target. It is increasing 40% faster here than in the United States, all because of Liberal taxes. The Prime Minister is using a credit card with no limit to finance his deficit. Does he expect Canadians to pay for their groceries that way too?”
Clarity & specificity
88%
B+ — The question is mostly clear and focused, citing specific data and making a direct ask about grocery prices.
Question Factors
- •Cites Statistics Canada data
- •Specific focus on grocery prices
- •Direct question about financing groceries
Mark Carney
Prime Minister
“Mr. Speaker, I have good news. We are creating jobs, and inflation is dropping. The inflation rate has been within the Bank of Canada's target range for almost two years in a row. We are growing the economy, reducing inflation and building Canada's future.”
How directly answered
62%
Sharp question met with total deflection.
D- — The answer does not address the question about grocery prices or food inflation.
Answer Factors
- •Complete deflection from the core question
- •Generic statements about job creation
- •No engagement with cited evidence
Pierre Poilievre
Leader of the Opposition
“Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister's costly deficit gambles our future on the national credit card, and it drives up food, housing and tax bills. In fact, the Parliamentary Budget Officer has revealed, in his recent report, the Prime Minister has doubled Justin Trudeau's deficit and he has brought in the biggest deficit in Canadian history outside of the pandemic, which is $16 billion bigger than he promised only seven months ago. Why is the Prime Minister breaking his word and forcing Canadians to pay higher inflation today and higher taxes tomorrow for his costly credit card budget?”
Clarity & specificity
85%
B — The question is clear and cites specific evidence, but could be more concise.
Question Factors
- •Clear structure with specific evidence cited
- •Direct question at the end
- •Some rhetorical elements present
Mark Carney
Prime Minister
“Mr. Speaker, today is a good day. Inflation is down 2.2%. For almost two years, it has been running within the Bank of Canada's target. This is a good month. Unemployment is down again, and jobs are up again. Today is a historic day. The Leader of the Opposition and his colleagues have an opportunity to vote for generational investment to build this economy strong.”
How directly answered
40%
Sharp question met with total deflection.
F — The answer does not address the question at all.
Answer Factors
- •Complete deflection from the question asked
- •Focuses on unrelated positive statistics
- •No engagement with the evidence cited
Want the worst 5 dodges every Friday? Join the newsletter or subscribe here:
Pierre Poilievre
Leader of the Opposition
“Mr. Speaker, maybe it is a good day for the Prime Minister and his Brookfield buddies, who are dodging their tax bills, but it is a terrible day for the Canadian people, stuck paying record-high grocery bills. In fact the Prime Minister said he would be judged by prices at the grocery store. Today, Statistics Canada revealed that grocery price inflation is almost double the Bank of Canada's target, rising 40% faster in Canada than in the United States of America, the direct result of the Liberal industrial carbon tax on farmers, of the food packaging tax and of the fuel standard tax. The Prime Minister puts his budget on the national credit card. Does he expect Canadians to pay for their groceries the same way?”
Clarity & specificity
85%
B — The question is clear and cites specific evidence regarding grocery price inflation and taxes.
Question Factors
- •Clear structure with specific data
- •Directly addresses the Prime Minister's previous statements
- •Focuses on a relevant issue affecting Canadians
Mark Carney
Prime Minister
“Mr. Speaker, the rate of inflation is down. Job creation is up. Ambition and confidence in this country are sky-high. We believe in Canada. We are investing in Canada. Today is the opportunity for every member of the House to join us.”
How directly answered
55%
Sharp question met with total deflection.
F — The answer does not address the question about grocery prices.
Answer Factors
- •Complete deflection from the specific issue
- •No engagement with cited evidence
- •Generic statements about inflation and job creation
Pierre Poilievre
Leader of the Opposition
“Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister is not investing in Canada; he is dodging his taxes by putting his money outside Canada, while the Canadian people cannot afford to eat, to heat, or to house themselves. Inflation is now nearly twice the target rate when it comes to the measurement of food, rising 40% faster in this country than south of the border. We have 100% more people lined up at food banks than in 2019, as the Prime Minister continues to raise taxes on farmers and on food packaging. The Prime Minister thinks he can put his budget on a limitless credit card. Does he really expect that Canadians are going to buy groceries the same way?”
Clarity & specificity
85%
B — The question is detailed and cites specific evidence.
Question Factors
- •Clear structure with specific statistics
- •Addresses multiple issues affecting Canadians
- •Strong rhetorical framing
Mark Carney
Prime Minister
“Mr. Speaker, again this month, just as it was last month and just as it has been every month while I have been Prime Minister, Canadian wages have grown faster than the rate of inflation. Canadians are getting ahead. We are creating jobs despite the attack on this economy by the Americans and despite the obstruction by the opposition. This is an opportunity to build our country. The vote is today. Stand up and be counted.”
How directly answered
60%
Sharp question met with vague economic claims.
D- — The answer does not address the question directly.
Answer Factors
- •Ignores specific claims about inflation and food banks
- •Focuses on unrelated economic growth
- •Generic response without engagement with evidence
Pierre Poilievre
Leader of the Opposition
“Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister was right by Surrey the other day, handing out tax dollars and doughnuts in a photo op, but he refused to take questions on the 330% increase in extortion that Liberals caused with soft-on-crime laws and open border policies. They have allowed extortionists out of prison by eliminating mandatory prison sentences, and they have allowed foreign gangsters to have visitor visas and kill our people in the streets. Why is it that the Prime Minister had time, when he was near Surrey, to hand out doughnuts but not to stand up and protect Canadians against extortion?”
Clarity & specificity
85%
B — The question is clear and specific, with a strong ask about the Prime Minister's actions regarding crime and extortion.
Question Factors
- •Clear question structure
- •Specific evidence cited
- •Direct ask at the end
Mark Carney
Prime Minister
“Mr. Speaker, there is an opportunity to stand up and protect Canadians against extortion, against home invasion, against gun crime and against online harm to children. We are putting the legislation in front of the House. The opposition has a chance to support it. We will protect Canadians.”
How directly answered
65%
Sharp question met with vague assurances.
D — The answer vaguely addresses crime but avoids the specifics of the question.
Answer Factors
- •General statements about legislation
- •No engagement with specific claims
- •Deflection from the core issue raised
Like grading politicians? Get the Top 5 every Friday.
The week's worst dodges, delivered free to your inbox.