Question Period - Wednesday, March 11, 2026
Wednesday, March 11, 2026
Question Period session with 6 exchanges between Hon. Pierre Poilievre (Leader of the Opposition, CPC) and Right Hon. Mark Carney (Prime Minister, Lib.). Average Question Rigor: 82. Average PM Spin: 63.
SESSION OVERVIEW

Pierre Poilievre
Leader of Opposition
(82%)
Question Rigor
SPINHIGH
SPIN

Mark Carney
Prime Minister
(63%)
Answer Directness
Pierre Poilievre
Leader of the Opposition
“Mr. Speaker, there are only two types of people: those who are Irish and those who wish they were. The Prime Minister had four flip-flops on Iran, but the flip-flops at home have been even worse. The Liberal government is claiming that the Global News report that indicated that there are 700 Iranian agents here in Canada is false. However, yesterday, the Liberals admitted that 239 agents have had their visas revoked, but only one of them has been deported. That means that there are at least 238 Iranian agents here in Canada at a time when we are seeing terrorist attacks on synagogues and other places. Does the Prime Minister want to flip-flop again and tell us how many Iranian government agents are here threatening our population?”
Clarity & specificity
85%
B — The question is clear and specific, citing evidence about Iranian agents and asking a direct question about the number of agents in Canada.
Question Factors
- •Clear structure
- •Cites specific evidence
- •Direct ask at the end
Mark Carney
Prime Minister
“Mr. Speaker, this is a very serious situation. First, the government has already banned 10,000 IRGC officers from entering Canada. Second, 170 investigations are under way, and like the Minister of Public Safety said, 28 are currently being subject to an extensive review process.”
How directly answered
65%
Sharp question met with vague reassurances.
D — The answer acknowledges the seriousness but avoids addressing the specific question about the number of Iranian agents.
Answer Factors
- •General statements
- •No engagement with specific evidence
- •Avoided the core ask
Pierre Poilievre
Leader of the Opposition
“Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister had four flip-flops on Iran in just the same number of days. This is a pattern. He has also flip-flopped on oil and gas. He wrote a book called Values, in which he said he wanted to keep 50% of our energy in the ground. He said in that book that he wanted to raise carbon taxes, and then he claimed that he had flip-flopped on that, while he has since kept in place every antidevelopment law that Trudeau passed, he has renamed the carbon tax, and he has brought in an industrial carbon tax that has driven away an $8-billion project. Will he flip-flop again and reverse these Liberal policies so that we can actually supply the world with the energy it needs in this critical time?”
Clarity & specificity
75%
C — The question is lengthy and contains multiple points but ends with a clear ask about reversing policies.
Question Factors
- •Multiple points made
- •Clear ask at the end
- •References to specific policies
Mark Carney
Prime Minister
“Mr. Speaker, I appreciate receiving this gift on this day honouring Ireland. Canada has increased at record levels our oil exports. Canada has approved, under this government, Ksi Lisims. Canada has approved and started one of the biggest LNGs. Canada is working to the lowest-carbon LNG and the lowest-carbon oil exports in the world. We will maintain and increase our competitive position. We are driving straight forward.”
How directly answered
62%
Question with substance, answer completely sidestepped.
D- — The answer does not address the question directly and avoids specific evidence.
Answer Factors
- •Generic statements about oil exports
- •No engagement with the question's specifics
- •Focus on unrelated achievements
Pierre Poilievre
Leader of the Opposition
“Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister is driving in circles. He said that he wanted to keep 50% of our oil in the ground. He supported blocking the pipeline to the Pacific. He has not approved a single oil pipeline, and his Major Projects Office has not approved a project of any kind. He has just tried to take credit for a project approved by Prime Minister Harper. Next he will be trying to claim credit for the Canadian Pacific Railway. Will the Prime Minister flip-flop again, reverse his support of an industrial carbon tax and the Liberal antidevelopment laws, and get out of the way so that we can build pipelines to the Pacific to power paycheques for our people?”
Clarity & specificity
75%
C — The question is somewhat clear but overly rhetorical.
Question Factors
- •Multiple points made, leading to some confusion.
- •Ends with a clear ask about reversing policies.
- •Cites specific policies and actions.
Mark Carney
Prime Minister
“Mr. Speaker, as I said in my book, as it is the policy of this government, we want the lowest-risk, the lowest-carbon and the lowest-cost oil and gas, and that is what makes ours competitive. That is the story of Canadian LNG. That is the story of the MOU with Alberta. That is the story of Bay du Nord. That is how we drive the country forward and not off a cliff like the member opposite.”
How directly answered
62%
Question lost in rhetoric; answer completely dodged.
D- — The answer does not directly address the question.
Answer Factors
- •Vague references to policy without addressing specifics.
- •No engagement with the question's evidence.
- •Deflects to general statements about competitiveness.
Want the worst 5 dodges every Friday? Join the newsletter or subscribe here:
Pierre Poilievre
Leader of the Opposition
“Mr. Speaker, the world cannot put meaningless pieces of paper and meaningless MOUs in its gas tank. It needs real energy that comes out of our ground. The Prime Minister said he wants to keep it in the ground, and yet today we have the hilarious spectacle of the Liberal natural resources minister saying that Canada will do what it can to help with its stockpiles for the current energy shortage. Our stockpiles are zero. Will the Prime Minister flip-flop again and adopt my policy that we should have a strategic oil and mineral reserve so that we can supply the world in the future?”
Clarity & specificity
85%
B — The question is clear and specific, asking about the Prime Minister's stance on a strategic oil reserve, but the preamble is somewhat lengthy and rhetorical.
Question Factors
- •Clear ask about policy adoption
- •Specific context provided
- •Lengthy rhetorical setup
Mark Carney
Prime Minister
“Mr. Speaker, there are many policies of the member opposite that I will not adopt. One of them is flip-flopping, jumping around and searching for ridings every election. The second thing I will not adopt is the importance of having the most competitive oil and gas in the world. Our oil exports have never been higher. Under this government, exports are over five million barrels per day, and that will increase, because they will be low-carbon, low-cost and low-risk.”
How directly answered
62%
Sharp question met with evasive rhetoric.
D- — The answer does not engage with the question about a strategic reserve and instead focuses on unrelated achievements.
Answer Factors
- •Complete deflection from the core question
- •Attacks the opposition instead of addressing the ask
- •No engagement with the specifics of the question
Pierre Poilievre
Leader of the Opposition
“Mr. Speaker, sometimes the Prime Minister makes it too easy. Today we have zero oil stockpiles. We have a strategic maple syrup stockpile, which he could use to put maple syrup on the pancakes that he flip-flops on, but we do not have any oil to supply to the world in the time of this crisis. Will he reverse the antidevelopment policies that he has supported, which have come from the previous Liberal government, in order to unlock our production and power the world and the paycheques here at home?”
Clarity & specificity
85%
B — The question is clear and specific, asking about reversing anti-development policies to increase oil production.
Question Factors
- •Clear specific ask
- •Cites current oil stockpile situation
- •Engages with broader context of energy crisis
Mark Carney
Prime Minister
“Mr. Speaker, this is the way the G7 oil reserve works: If a nation is an importer, it has to have an oil reserve. If a nation is an exporter, which Canada is under this government, if it has record exports, which Canada does under this government, that is how it supplies the world. I salute the work of the Minister of Natural Resources and the Minister of Finance, who, working with G7 counterparts, confirmed with my G7 leader counterparts today the release of 400 million barrels from that strategic reserve.”
How directly answered
62%
Question clear, answer evasive and off-topic.
D- — The answer deflects from the specific question and does not engage with the cited evidence.
Answer Factors
- •Does not address the reversal of policies
- •Focuses on oil reserves without answering the ask
- •Generic response about exports
Pierre Poilievre
Leader of the Opposition
“Mr. Speaker, of the 400 million barrels of oil released from that strategic stockpile, how many are coming from Canada? There are exactly zero. The Prime Minister's excuse, the reason we have no stockpiles, he says, is that we are a producer of oil. This is exactly the opposite of logic. The United States is a producer of oil. They have stockpiles. We have reserves, which the Prime Minister is successfully keeping in the ground. Just last week, we saw an $8-billion project cancelled under his watch. We are importing gas from Australia. Why will he not get out of the way so that we can produce our own energy?”
Clarity & specificity
85%
B — The question is clear and specific, asking about Canadian oil production in relation to stockpiles, but it could be more concise.
Question Factors
- •Clear specific ask
- •Cites evidence (400 million barrels)
- •Engages with policy implications
Mark Carney
Prime Minister
“Mr. Speaker, the member opposite thinks he is on a rich vein, but he is tapping a dry well. Under this government, production has never been so high. Exports have never been so high. We approved Bay du Nord. We are working with the Province of Alberta to produce the lowest-cost, lowest-carbon oil and gas. We are expanding our exports. We are expanding our future.”
How directly answered
62%
Question ignored; PM offered generic responses.
D- — The answer does not address the specific question about Canadian oil production and stockpiles.
Answer Factors
- •Complete deflection from the question
- •Generic talking points
- •No engagement with the evidence cited
Like grading politicians? Get the Top 5 every Friday.
The week's worst dodges, delivered free to your inbox.